Product analysis

InfiniFi cover,
coverage and gaps.

Cover for the on-chain bank InfiniFi: only a contract hack is covered, but an iUSD depeg (the main risk) and losses at Aave or Ethena underneath are excluded; new and risky.

Raccoon Score 59/100 Limited

Who this is for: iUSD holders protecting against an InfiniFi failure

Verdict

This is among the riskiest listings in the set so far, and the cover fits it least well. What is covered is an exploit of InfiniFi own contracts, on a protocol with genuine strengths (renounced ownership, fully on-chain reserves, tests and fuzzing, a coded loss waterfall) but real weaknesses (new in 2025, novel design, no named third-party audit we could confirm, and reserves deployed into higher-risk venues including Ethena). The two dominant risks sit outside the cover: an iUSD depeg is excluded as a protocol-issued asset (10.6), and losses at the underlying farms are outside the designated protocol. The market agrees it is riskier: cover here is priced near {phrase:minPricePct} per year (live), well into multiples of a blue-chip AMM rate.

Confidence: medium 7 red flags As of 2026-07-22

Full report locked

The score above is free. The full analysis behind it is a paid, sourced report.

Coverage check & real-risk fit
Coverage gap map
Claims process & payout history
Live on-chain data & capital
Loss simulator (stress test)
Premium cross-check
Red flags & open questions
Full Raccoon Score (7 categories)
Methodology & sources

Unlocking reports is paused for now while we review the payment flow. The score above stays free. If you already bought this report, it stays available in the browser you bought it in.

InfiniFi cover,coverage and gaps.

Full report locked

InfiniFi cover,
coverage and gaps.