COVERRACCOON
← Nexus Mutual
Product analysis

Ether.fi slashing cover,
coverage and gaps.

Catastrophe cover for ether.fi stakers against a mass slashing: only kicks in above 5,000 ETH of loss (nothing for small events) and is a private umbrella cover, not a retail product.

Raccoon Score 61/100 Limited

Who this is for: The ether.fi team, protecting its STAKERS (eETH/weETH holders) against catastrophic slashing

Verdict

A different animal from the retail listings: private, fixed-price at 0.75% per year, with a 5,000 ETH deductible, so it pays only on a catastrophic, correlated slashing event, not routine slashing. That structure fits its target, because restaking multiplies the slashing surface: on top of Ethereum consensus slashing, EigenLayer AVS slashing is now live and can even redistribute slashed funds. Ether.fi is a top-tier, heavily audited LRT (weETH carries an A+ risk rating), which supports the covered protocol. The caveats: the attachment point is very high (nothing until 5,000 ETH, tens of millions of dollars), it is not openly purchasable, the restaking-slashing surface it insures is genuinely new and largely untested, and non-slashing LRT risks (a contract bug, an eETH discount) are not this cover. It is also the single largest exposure in the whole set.

Confidence: medium 6 red flags As of 2026-07-22

Full report locked

The score above is free. The full analysis behind it is a paid, sourced report.

  • Coverage check & real-risk fit
  • Coverage gap map
  • Claims process & payout history
  • Live on-chain data & capital
  • Loss simulator (stress test)
  • Premium cross-check
  • Red flags & open questions
  • Full Raccoon Score (7 categories)
  • Methodology & sources

Unlocking reports is paused for now while we review the payment flow. The score above stays free. If you already bought this report, it stays available in the browser you bought it in.

COVERRACCOON

Independent analysis of DeFi cover. We read the terms nobody else opens.

© 2026 Cover Raccoon. Analyses are dated snapshots with sources, not insurance advice and not a recommendation. Terms can change; the provider wording always governs.